Bill Kearney argues for loose

Bill Kearney argues for loose categorization schemes in facets. I agree about, say, 100%. XFML. “What I’m expecting is the emergence of coincidences or accidental associations. I see these as being far more enlightening that rigid methods that merely confirm the obvious. The inspiration found from the kick on the side of the head is a often quite a bit more potent than hanging around a mob of simpering sycophants.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s